In the last chapter, you learned how to estimate an unknown number with a clear path.
Brainstorming is different. Now the interviewer is not asking for a number. They are asking for options.
- What could the client do?
- What else might explain this?
- What risks should we consider?
- What other data could we use if this data is unavailable?
For many candidates, this is the moment the mind goes strangely blank. Not because they have no ideas, but because the prompt suddenly feels wide open. There are too many directions, too little time, and a quiet pressure to sound creative on demand.
The intuition
Brainstorming is how you create options with structure.
You are not waiting for a brilliant idea to appear. You are building a few clean categories, then using each category to produce useful ideas. That is the whole move.
If "buckets first" sounds familiar, it should. This is the same skill you built in Chapter 1: clean buckets that overlap as little as possible and cover the main angles, just pointed at options instead of causes.
We could do marketing, discounts, partnerships, new products, maybe improve the app, maybe cut costs...
I would organize ideas into three groups: win back customer traffic, increase average order value, and protect margin. Under traffic, I would consider...
The second version does not depend on magical creativity. It gives your mind places to look. A blank page is hard. A few buckets make the page less blank.
Why it matters
Brainstorming tests whether you can think broadly without becoming messy. The interviewer wants to see:
- Can you generate multiple relevant ideas?
- Can you organize them instead of spraying them randomly?
- Can you go beyond the obvious first two ideas?
- Can you stay practical and business-relevant?
- Can you recover when asked, "What else?"
- Can you prioritize the best ideas instead of ending with a long list?
This matters because consulting work is not only diagnosis. Clients also need choices. Once you know why something is happening, you often need to answer, "What could we do about it?" And the first answer is rarely enough.
The core moves
- 1PauseWhat type of ideas are we generating?
- 2FrameWhat 3-4 categories will guide the brainstorm?
- 3GenerateWhat ideas fit inside each category?
- 4StretchWhat else, using a new lens?
- 5PrioritizeWhich ideas are most attractive?
- 6MoveWhat would we test or do next?
Throughout this chapter, we will keep using the same running case:
Now the client asks:
1. Pause: understand what kind of brainstorm this is.
Not all brainstorming prompts ask for the same thing. Sometimes the interviewer wants causes, sometimes actions, sometimes risks, and sometimes data sources. Before you answer, take a short pause and identify the job.
2. Frame: create buckets before ideas.
This is the move that separates a strong brainstorm from a messy one. Buckets before ideas, every time.
- local offers
- office partnerships
- commuter promotions
- breakfast bundles
- premium drinks
- app upsell
- targeted discounts
- labor scheduling
- waste reduction
You could also frame the same brainstorm by time horizon or customer journey.
Immediate moves, medium-term improvements, and longer-term strategic changes.
Awareness, consideration, purchase, and retention.
There is no single perfect frame. The best frame is the one that fits the prompt and helps you generate useful ideas without overlap.
3. Generate: make the ideas specific enough to be useful.
Once you have buckets, fill them. For Region B:
- targeted winback offers for lapsed loyalty members
- morning-commute promotions near affected stores
- office or gym weekday coffee bundles
- coffee plus breakfast bundles
- higher-margin seasonal drinks
- app-based upsell offers for frequent customers
- avoid broad discounting
- improve labor scheduling in slower dayparts
- adjust pastry production to reduce waste
Notice what makes these better than generic ideas. They are tied to the business, the region, the likely customer behavior, and the profit goal.
4. Stretch: handle "what else?" without panicking.
"What else?" is one of the most uncomfortable questions in a case. Often the interviewer is just testing whether you can keep generating under pressure. The move is simple: do not search harder inside the same bucket. Change lenses.
- 1PauseTake one second to reset.
- 2Name a new lensCustomer journey, operations, time horizon, risks, or data sources.
- 3GenerateAdd one or two ideas inside that lens.
- 4Tie backConnect the ideas to the client's objective.
5. Prioritize: do not leave the interviewer with a pile.
Generating ideas is only half the move. The other half is judgment. After you brainstorm, pick the most attractive ideas using a simple filter.
6. Move: connect the brainstorm back to the case.
A strong brainstorm ends by saying what you would test next.
Now the ideas are not floating. They are connected to evidence and action.
What weak looks like
What strong looks like
The answer is creative because it is organized. Not despite the structure. Because of it.
Common traps
- Listing ideas without categories.
- Choosing categories that overlap.
- Stopping after two obvious ideas.
- Trying to be wildly creative instead of useful.
- Giving generic ideas that could apply to any company.
- Ignoring the client's objective.
- Forgetting constraints like margin or implementation cost.
- Ending without prioritizing.
The most common trap is thinking creativity means less structure. In cases, it usually means better structure.
How to use this later in CaseLab
When a live case later asks for ideas, use this chapter as your feedback lens. The move is not to be wildly creative on command; it is to pause, create clear buckets, generate specific ideas, and close by prioritizing the best options.
Later, in a CaseLab rep, review whether your brainstorm was:
- Structured into clear buckets.
- Broad enough to cover multiple paths.
- Deep enough to include specific ideas.
- Practical and tied to the case.
- Responsive to "what else?" prompts.
- Prioritized using impact, feasibility, speed, and risk.